To carry on, lets take a closer look at these boroughs that have been enriched with niggers, pakis and other assorted non white scum.
92% OF GANG RAPISTS IN LONDON ARE NON WHITE!!
Quote:
LONDON GANG RAPE:
Boroughs with the highest rates of gang rapes include Lambeth, Croydon, Newham, Southwark, Westminster and Hackney. The Met has commissioned research from Dr Miranda Horvath, a lecturer in forensic psychology at the University of Surrey. She is focusing on the “cultural context” of gang rape and liaising with police across Britain. She is also examining the experience of the United States.
The Met also said it had asked for research into the issues of female gang membership and gang violence. Mr Yexley's report shows that in 2008/09 eight per cent of groups of gang rape suspects were white, 32 per cent were black, and 24 per cent contained members of different ethnicities. The make-up for the rest was unknown.
The proportion of white victims fell from 69 per cent in 1998/99 to 50 per cent last year, while the number of black victims doubled from 17 per cent to 34 per cent.
|
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...-increasing.do
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...s-1816334.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8345673.stm
If we take a close look at these figures, we can see that the slags responsible for putting said figures together have included as 'white' such undesirables as Turks, Gypos and the like, thus massaging away a proportion of the attacks perpetrated by non whites on whites.
There are about 350,000 Turks living in Britain, mostly in London. Recently a Turkish gang (one gang) was thought to have brought over 100,000 illegal Turks. Many of these criminals would have been young males. Turks are included in the category 'White' where crime statistics are concerned. I doubt the real White gang rape is 1% and the 'indigenous White' is more than 0.1%.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...in-510591.html
As if the above specious massaging wasnt enough of an evil on its own, we can also observe the various anti white commentators clamouring to paint the rapes not as a racial issue, but one of cultural circumstance:
Quote:
|
"A disproportionate number of victims and perpetrators are Black. It's nothing to do with race, however, it's just that more Afro-Caribbean boys live in the six boroughs worst effected." - London Tonight
|
Quote:
|
"What I do not understand is what motivates people to commit this particular type of offence in these particular circumstances.
|
Quote:
The Met has commissioned research from Dr Miranda Horvath, a lecturer in forensic psychology at the University of Surrey.
She is focusing on the "cultural context" of gang rape and speaking to officers from forces across Britain and the United States.
|
What the reporters are implying is that the rapes aren't caused by the perpetrators, they're [supposedly] caused by the area they live in, thus somehow the area they live in and all of 'them' living together makes for/justifies more rape. These bastards just can't admit, even with the evidence right in front of them that these filthy coons commit more rape because they're black!!
This means, that said commentators are [de facto] stating that gang rape just so happens to occur more frequently in those six boroughs and if said boroughs were 100% white the same amount of rapes would still occur just that it would be whites doing it? ALL UTTER BULLSHIT, and guess what? there exists ZERO evidence to back up the claim!
Infact, if we compare cities with varying racial demographics but similar economic backgrounds, and then look to the crime levels thereof, we can see ABSOLUTELY that the best indicator of said crime is NOT economics but infact the proportion of non whites living there!!
Its easier for these bastards to cobble together all manner of cultural excuses for rape, nevermind the fact that niggers are not only the disproportionate perpetrators of gang rape, they also disproportionately commit ALL other crime too!
Committing acts like this is assuredly NOT a byproduct of the area you live in. As said, there are millions of whites living below the poverty line, plenty of white people who have grown up on really awful estates, myself included, and no where can you find figures demonstrating a propensity to commit crime on par with niggers!!
Yes folks, for the jews, the lefty underlings and other assorted anti white scum, the above quoted specious presentation forms the most logical conclusion that they can draw from the statistics. First it's whitey's fault, now it's the area they live in; to these people its is ALL YOUR FAULT WHITE MAN!
Its a shame said commentators cannot grasp that these areas have gone to shit not because said areas are shit, but because the JEWS AND TRAITORS have filled them with non white scum. They can't seem to fathom that it's BECAUSE the niggers are living in those areas, that those areas are most effected!!
This sorry situation is not isolated to the UK, no, the same incidence of non white on white rape/other crimes (of which are followed by the 'nigger friendly PR job' spewed by the jews and self loathing whites traitor scum) can be witnessed across Europe and the USA.
Recall if You will, the quote from the assholes in ther UK media keen to blame these rapes upon cultural effects:
Quote:
|
"A disproportionate number of victims and perpetrators are Black. It's nothing to do with race, however, it's just that more Afro-Caribbean boys live in the six boroughs worst effected." - London Tonight
|
Quote:
"What I do not understand is what motivates people to commit this particular type of offence in these particular circumstances.
Quote:
|
The Met has commissioned research from Dr Miranda Horvath, a lecturer in forensic psychology at the University of Surrey.
|
She is focusing on the "cultural context" of gang rape and speaking to officers from forces across Britain and the United States.
|
Now, remember the above quotes are from scumbag apologists in the UK, so lets have a look at what similar anti white bastards are saying in the US? I mean, only the most cynical would assume it might be the exact same thing, eh? After we will look at the figures for the USA, UK and continental Europe.
THE RECENT MEXICAN GANG RAPE, RICHMOND USA:
Quote:
Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner spoke briefly to the gathering, announcing her office has jump-started the permit process to build the new fence around the campus.
"This kind of gang rape is certainly not normal," she said. "It rises to our attention how we really need to address the heart of the issues.
She said economic stresses, foreclosures and other combinations may have exacerbated the horrific crime.
|
Quote:
The family's pastor read a prepared statement during a community meeting in the school's auditorium Saturday morning.
"Please do not respond to this tragic event by promoting hatred or by causing more pain.
|
http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-...nclick_check=1
Yes, lets blame social ills, which means fuck all other than "Hey Deshawn, blame 'the man'... the evil white man!"
So, now we have exposed the anti white structures (church pastors, elected officials) acting as gate keepers of white anger, along with the anti white apologists, let us now move onto the actual figures, all of which (whether from the UK, the USA or across the WHOLE of contineltal Europe) reveal the EXACT same thing, that niggers, pakis, mexcrement and other filth are committing crimes against non whites in disproportionate quanta:
GLOBAL CRIME WAVE:
Since mass immigration began, per thousand head of population the number of indictable offences commited in the UK - since 1954 - has risen from 9.7 in 1954 to 89.1 as of 1997. Likewise, the number of murders per million population has more than doubled in that time, rising from 6.3 in 1955 to over 14 in 1997.
Source: The House Of Commons research paper 'A century of Change, Trends in UK statistics since 1900'
The same rise in crime figures can be seen across Europe and the US, for example, if we look firstly to Sweden we can see the following:
- Total number of crimes in 1950: 195,261
- Total number of crimes in 2006: 1,224,958
- Number of rapes in 1950: 350
- Number of rapes in 2006: 4,208
SOURCE: Kriminalstatistik, Rättsstatistisk årsbok and Statistisk årsbok.
In Norway:
- Total number of crimes in 1960: 38,700
- Total number of crimes in 2006: 1,224,958
- Number of rapes in 1960: 66
- Number of rapes in 2002: 495
- Crimes per 1000 population 1960: 10.8
- Crimes per 1000 population 2002: 65.6
Source: Statistics Norway
Immigrants behind most cases of aggravated sexual assault - All rapes in Oslo commited by immigrants:
http://www.norwaypost.no/content/view/21900/26/
Sweden tops Europe rape charts:
Statistics from Sweden’s National Council for Crime Prevention show that the number of reported rapes against children is on the rise. The figures have nearly doubled in the last ten years: 467 rapes against children under the age of 15 were reported in 2004 compared with 258 in 1995. Legal proceedings continue this week in a case involving a 13 year old girl from Motala who was said to have been subjected to a group rape by four men. (Note: These four men were Kurdish Muslims, who raped the girl for hours and even took photos of doing so)
AND THIS IS WHAT THE SCUM ARE SYAING ABOUT IT ALL:
Quote:
|
“Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes” because Muslim men found their manner of dress provocative. The professor’s conclusion was not that Muslim men living in the West needed to adjust to Western norms, but the exact opposite: “Norwegian women must realize that we live in a Multicultural society and adapt themselves to it
|
From the US, I'll list the sources first for this one:
Sources:
- The FBI's uniform crime reports (UCRs)
- The National Crime Victimization Study (NCVS) in which 149,000 people across the country, in statistical proportion to all - demographic groups, were called
- The National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)
- Supplemental Homicide Reports (SHRs)
- State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS)
- National Youth Gang Survey
- Federal Justice - Statistics Program (FJSP)
- National Corrections Reporting Program (NCRP)
- “… between 2001 and 2003, blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than the reverse, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.”
- Between 2001 and 2003, blacks committed, on average, 15,400 black-on-white rapes per year, while whites averaged only 900 white-on-black rapes per year.
- “Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.”
But there are five-and-one-half as many whites as blacks. If anything, the numbers should be reversed. After all, as leftists always tell us, all groups are supposed to be equally represented in all categories, for good or ill. (Well, not really. Leftists never call on the NBA and NFL to institute racial parity for white players.)
- Nationally, youth gangs are 90 percent non-white. “Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.”
- The only crime category in which Asians are more heavily represented than whites is illegal gambling.
- “Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are black.”
- “… police are determined to arrest non-black rather than black criminals.” (I have seen this practice in operation on the streets and subways of New York.)
- “[Blacks] are eight times more likely than people of other races to rob someone, for example, and 5.5 times more likely to steal a car.”
- Charges of racial profiling, which maintain that police target innocent black motorists for traffic stops notwithstanding, a 2002 study by Maryland’s Public Service Research Institute found that police were stopping too few black speeders (23%), compared to their proportion of actual speeders (25%). In fact, “blacks were twice as likely to speed as whites” in general, and there was an even higher frequency of black speeders in the 90-mph and higher range.
- “… the only evidence for police bias is disproportionate arrest rates for those groups police critics say are the targets of bias. High black arrest rates appear to reflect high crime rates, not police misconduct.”
- Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than non-blacks, but their crimes are more violent than those of whites. Blacks are three times as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with guns, and twice as likely as non-blacks to commit assault with knives.
- Blacks not only commit violent crimes at far higher rates than whites, but blacks commit “white collar” offenses -- fraud, bribery, racketeering and embezzlement, respectively -- at two to five times the white rate.
- The single greatest indicator of an area’s crime rate is not poverty or education, but race and ethnicity. Even when one controls for income and education, the black crime rate is much higher than the white rate.
To close, and as I have asked before: please tell me, how poor does someone have to be before the liberal scum give them the green light to rape town? Sadly, we can find the answer above!
ITS THE SAME STORY ALL OVER THE WHITE LANDS THAT HAVE HAD THE IMMIGRATION DOOR OPENED BY JEWS AND TREASONOUS FREEE MASONIC TYPES!
Contemporary mass immigration exists not for the betterment of non whites, but as the [de facto] preferred method of the stealthy jew so keen on displacing the indigenous white populous en route to the end game of said jew, that being, the bloody genocide of our proud, white volk.... are you going to sit and beg like a cunt whilst that occurs?
14
Linear Mode
